I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I'm hesitant to burn the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is 50 bullets. But I actually need to locate a bullet inside the a hundred and sixty class that my more mature rifle likes.
H4831 will operate from the Swift although not actual nicely. You are going to never have the pressures you need for regularity with the .223. 760, or H414 will probably be much better but for some motive I ain't the most significant lover of most ball powders.
This is one of the biggest motives reloaders are admonished to work with new data only; and to get started on minimal when you will get a completely new large amount of powder. You do not really know (Except if the corporation tells you so) that the new large amount of powder was even manufactured at the same manufacturing facility given that the powder you obtain a several years ago.
Together with the 154 grain Hornady SP inside the 280, H4831 gave me great teams and very good velocity, but Rottweil R905 incorporates a substantially increased velocity and gives marginally better precision. With Swift 150 grain Sciroccos during the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave exceptional accuracy and velocity, but RL22 was marginally better. Therefore, in Just about every of these circumstances I went with One more powder, but I would certainly despise to divest myself in the H4831.
Yup or it is not going to function very well. And Because the OP contains a load using Varget I would try to seek out somebody to trade with. Could possibly come up with a gain acquire predicament.
I know, rough situations. H4831SC will definitely do the job, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded long. I don't recall powder charge off the highest of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that's where I ordinarily aim to get. In your situation making use of what you have (and what I must have done) I'd begin with the top in the bearing floor of your bullet correct with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you discover a velocity node.
Any person loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the effects, any data you are able to share? Must also point out I have some ELD-X one hundred seventy five's I wish to take a look at out, When you have facts on that as well.
Like claimed earlier h4831sc mentioned, exact same things. All of that differs is the dimensions of your kernels. I did hear somewhere that they are going to only make the SC Later on. I don't know if that's legitimate or not but would seem sensible to me. I take advantage of SC mainly because which is what I present in the eight lb jug and it really works.
Chances are you'll both: 1) Carry on and have the firearm(s) outlined below automatically faraway from your browsing cart:
Additionally, it goes on to express that as a result of fshorter grains, that load density may be slightly greater.
This really is an more mature thread, you might not receive a reaction, and could be reviving an old thread. Please take into consideration making a new thread.
It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Uncovered a node and shot some groups. I shot a .6 five shot h4831 vs h4831sc team now. It is really just a little slower than H1000, but shoots fantastic. Many thanks for the advice, It really is very good to recognize that I have got alternatives when just one or one other powder is dried up.
rayporter mentioned: i under no circumstances noticed a distinction apart from the typical is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan. Click to grow...
Of course, h4831sc load data sitting down around for twenty+ decades (I know a man who remains utilizing the H4831 he purchased while in the 60s), implies that burn up prices will probably change a smidge, and new manufacture things will likely be a little unique way too.